Web Analytics Made Easy - Statcounter
The Power of Appointment in Cemetery Management BACK

The Power of Appointment in Cemetery Management

A historical exploration from the 1600s to the present, with brief insights into potential misuse and preventive measures.


Historical Context

In the 17th and 18th centuries, burials in England predominantly took place in churchyards. As urban populations grew, these sites became overcrowded, leading to unsanitary conditions and public health concerns. This situation necessitated the establishment of new cemeteries and the development of formal management structures.


Legislative Developments

To address these challenges, several key legislative measures were introduced:

  • Cemeteries Clauses Act 1847: This Act provided a framework for the establishment and regulation of cemeteries by burial authorities. It outlined powers and duties, including the appointment of personnel for cemetery management. (legislation.gov.uk)
  • Local Authorities' Cemeteries Order 1977 (LACO 1977): This order granted burial authorities broad powers for the proper management, regulation, and control of cemeteries. It emphasized the need for cemeteries to be kept in good order and repair. (legislation.gov.uk)

Potential for Misuse

While direct records of misuse related to the power of appointment in cemetery management are scarce, the broad authorities granted by legislation like LACO 1977 could, in theory, be misapplied in several ways:

  • Nepotism and Unqualified Appointments: Authorities might appoint individuals based on personal connections rather than qualifications, leading to ineffective management.
  • Financial Mismanagement: Appointed managers could potentially misuse funds allocated for cemetery maintenance, resulting in neglect and deterioration of the grounds.
  • Lack of Oversight: Without proper checks and balances, appointed individuals might not adhere to established regulations, compromising the integrity and sanctity of burial sites.

Cautionary Tales

One illustrative incident, though not directly related to the power of appointment, highlights the importance of oversight in cemetery-related decisions:

  • Stonehenge Burial Controversy (1924): The First Commissioner of Works permitted the interment of ashes within the Stonehenge monument for a group identifying as Druids. This decision faced strong opposition from the Wiltshire Archaeological Society, which viewed it as a desecration of a significant historical site. (thetimes.co.uk)

Preventive Measures

To mitigate potential misuse of appointment powers in cemetery management, the following measures are advisable:

  • Transparent Appointment Processes: Establish clear criteria and procedures to ensure that appointments are based on merit and relevant expertise.
  • Regular Audits and Inspections: Implement routine evaluations of cemetery management practices to detect and address any issues promptly.
  • Community Engagement: Encourage involvement from local communities and heritage organizations to promote accountability and preserve the cultural and historical significance of cemeteries.